Cases 1 - 10 of 96
TALBERT v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
RANDY IRWIN, JOHN BLICHA, IAN GUSTAFSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
LINDSEY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2023cv23287
Petitioner:
SIMONE LINDSEY
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and RYAN O' DEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steven Woodson, Jr. v. Jodi Sheesley, et al
as 23-2942
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN W. WOODSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
JODI SHEESLEY, BRIAN SIMONS, ANGEL GRESSEL and others
Simon v. BOP Allenwood Low
as 1:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Daryl Simon
Respondent:
BOP Allenwood Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SIMON v. MACAULAY et al
as 1:2022cv06092
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY D. SIMON
Defendant:
GRACE MACAULAY, CYNTHIA JENTSCH RUSSOMANNO and CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyuan Simon v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCI, et al
as 22-1882
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TYUAN SIMON
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT MAHANOY SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
FITZGERALD v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
DAVID WONTAE FITZGERALD
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, JENNIFER SCHAEFFER, NATHAN SIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simon v. Smith et al
as 1:2021cv00970
Defendant:
Sgt. Bower, Lt. Trevethan, Dr. Ashton and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Simon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMON v. ORTIZ
as 1:2021cv00489
Petitioner:
JOVAN CORNELIUS SIMON
Respondent:
DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WOODSON v. SHEESLEY et al
as 1:2020cv00310
Defendant:
JODI SHEESLEY, BRIAN SIMONS, I. GUSTAFSON and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W. WOODSON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
