Cases 41 - 50 of 61
Meeks v. Thierry et al
as 1:2010cv00826
Plaintiff:
Jason Meeks
Defendant:
C/O Thierry, Sgt. Simms, C/O Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
SIMON v. USA
as 1:2010cv00804
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DARRELL NORMAN SIMON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Butler et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 7:2010cv00142
Plaintiff:
John Douglas Butler, Eli Simon, Gregory P Lytle and others
Respondent:
Ford Motor Company, Continental General Tire Company, Continental Tire North America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2010cv00028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Case Opened in Error
as 7:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
2433 South Boulevard, LLC, LORRAINE ANGEL, Michael Austin and others
Receiver:
William K. Angel
Petitioner:
Julie Hunter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
CAMPBELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 1:2010cv00081
Plaintiff:
MELANIE SIMONE GOFORTH CAMPBELL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, A. W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, ALFA LAVAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00423
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Saint Mary and Simon Enterprises, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company
as 5:2009cv00239
Plaintiff:
Saint Mary and Simon Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
