Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Sipes
as 1:2024cv00328
Plaintiff: William Russell Sipes
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Type: Labor Labor: Other
MARELL v. PITTAK et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff: BETHANY MARELL
Defendant: OFFICER JOE PITTAK, OFFICER BRYCE BATLING, OFFICER MAKAYLA ELDRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRAY v. RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv02522
Defendant: HAWK, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff: ADAM BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Miami Correctional Facility et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00644
Defendant: Miami Correctional Facility, Grage, Taylor and others
Plaintiff: Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIPES et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00773
Plaintiff: MICHAEL SIPES and CONNIE SIPES
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HENDERSON v. STEVENS et al
as 2:2019cv00023
Defendant: SHELBY COUNTY JAIL, JERARD SIPES, JHON STEVENS, JR. and others
Plaintiff: CODY DILLION HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIPE v. USA
as 4:2015cv00080
Petitioner: TODD SIPE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SIPE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2015cv00896
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff: DEB SIPE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Rockey v. Sipes et al
as 2:2014cv00126
Defendant: Christopher S. Sipes , Sean Dolan and Adrian Bustos
Plaintiff: Laura Rockey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CROMWELL v. MARTINSVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2013cv01139
Plaintiff: THOMAS R. CROMWELL
Defendant: DARREN J. DAVIS, JON A. DAVIS, CITY OF MARTINSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?