Cases 1 - 10 of 51
SLOAN v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00564
Plaintiff:
DENNIS A. SLOAN
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, JAIL COMMANDER, A. FENI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOAN v. BURGESS et al
as 1:2023cv01680
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SCOTT SLOAN
Defendant:
SHERIFF DWAYNE BURGESS, MAJOR REINHART, LT. C. KAKAVECOS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan v. Burgess et al
as 1:2023cv00387
Plaintiff:
William Scott Sloan
Defendant:
Sheriff Dwayne Burgess, Major Reinhart, Lt. C. Kakavecos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sloan v. Franklin
as 3:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Roger Sloan
Defendant:
Franklin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KREILEIN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv00143
Petitioner:
ALAN KREILEIN
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA, TRACY BERRY, LAURA KLOIMWEIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SLOAN v. BURGESS
as 1:2022cv00406
Petitioner:
WILLIAM SLOAN
Respondent:
BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw et al v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Sergio Shaw, Marion Pattillo, Cleasan Dotson and others
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail, Milwaukee County Jail Administrator, Milwaukee County Jail Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOAN v. OKAFOR et al
as 1:2021cv02976
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY SLOAN
Defendant:
CHRISTABEL OKAFOR, WESTWAYS STAFFING SERVICE, IDOC PLAINFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chairs v. Daniels et al
as 3:2021cv01300
Plaintiff:
Amos Chairs
Defendant:
Mr. Daniels, Sloan and Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloan v. USA
as 4:2021cv04115
Petitioner:
Levi J Sloan
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
