Cases 61 - 70 of 132
Ostrowski v. Killion et al
as 1:2012cv02054
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Ostrowski
Defendant:
Paul Killion, Robert Fulton, Supreme Court of Pennsylania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sloan v. Chambers et al
as 3:2012cv01954
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sloan
Defendant:
Christopher Chambers, Shellenberger, Ellenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOAN v. SYNTHES, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv04286
Plaintiff:
EVA S. SLOAN
Defendant:
SYNTHES, INC. and NORIAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NILSON v. SOFTMART, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv03914
Plaintiff:
MARK JAY NILSON
Defendant:
SOFTMART, INC., SOFTMART COMMERICAL SERVICES INC., SOFTMART GOVERNMENT SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SLOAN v. FRASCELLA et al
as 2:2012cv03609
Plaintiff:
STACY SLOAN
Defendant:
LARRY FRASCELLA , DAVID FRASCELLA and LIGHTHOUSE LEGAL FINANCE, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SLOAN v. COUTTS et al
as 3:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
AARON SLOAN
Defendant:
R. COUTTS, J. J. SOSSON, T. FULTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sloane v. Associated Credit and Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 1:2011cv02083
Plaintiff:
Justin Sloane
Defendant:
Associated Credit and Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
SLOAN v. SAUERS
as 2:2011cv06360
Petitioner:
KEON SLOAN
Respondent:
DEBRA SAUERS, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SLOAN, JR. v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51772
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. SLOAN, JR.
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
