Cases 1 - 10 of 43
MCGRIFF v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 1:2022cv01547
Plaintiff:
Anthony McGriff
Defendant:
Captain Kauffman, SGT. Reihart, Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCGRIFF v. KAUFFMAN et al
as 2:2022cv03794
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MCGRIFF
Defendant:
MR. KAUFFMAN, SGT. REIHART, MR. LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SLOPPY v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2021cv01742
Plaintiff:
GRETCHEN SLOPPY
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Rhattigan v. Sloppy Seconds III LLC et al
as 8:2020cv02472
Defendant:
North Island Bar & Grille LLC, North Beach Pub LLC, Sloppy Seconds III LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Brad Rhattigan
Not Classified By Court:
Mark Hanley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hastings et al v. Desantis et al
as 8:2020cv01275
Defendant:
Mark Inch, Hope Gartman, Thomas Reimers and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Sloppy, Anthony Holley, Stephen Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SLOPPY v. JONES et al
as 4:2019cv00013
Plaintiff:
LEE SLOPPY
Defendant:
ACOSTA, MICHELLE SCHOUEST, A AEEVEDO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SLOPPY
as 3:2017cv00214
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
IRENE L. SLOPPY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sloppy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv01746
Petitioner:
Lee H. Sloppy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sloppy v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv01029
Plaintiff:
Duane Sloppy
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Curtis Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
