Cases 21 - 30 of 1,672
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al v. SMITH, JR.
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. and CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION
Defendant:
S.T. SMITH, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2023cv00200
Plaintiff:
JAMIE K. SMITH
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00580
Petitioner:
NICKOLAS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
PENELTON v. MARION COUNTY JAIL "ADC" DR. et al
as 2:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PENELTON
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL "ADC" DR., SMITH, PRIMARY HEALTHCARE PROVIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
MARCUS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
CLARK v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
DOMINIQUE CLARK
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, KEVIN GILMORE, RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NEAL v. MOSES et al
as 4:2023cv00190
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM SMITH NEAL, JR.
Defendant:
K. MOSES, BIRD, WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
