Cases 21 - 30 of 1,079
Curtis v. Lackawanna County et al
as 3:2023cv02092
Plaintiff:
Ryan Curtis
Defendant:
Lackawanna County, Wellpath, LLC, Nelson Anthony Iannuzzi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Christensen
as 1:2023cv02052
Petitioner:
Stephen Scott Smith
Respondent:
Warden D. Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dickson v. Washabaugh et al
as 1:2023cv02054
Plaintiff:
James E. Dickson
Defendant:
J. Washabaugh, Lt. Foster, C.O. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Franklin County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv02037
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Franklin County Jail and Warden Christopher Schell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Ralston et al
as 1:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Woods
Defendant:
George Ralston, Paula Price, Tracie Parkes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Harris v. Taurasi et al
as 1:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Cornelius E. Harris
Defendant:
Lee Ann Taurasi, Robert Martin, Eric Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
The Hilb Group of Maryland, LLC v. Smith
as 4:2023cv01978
Plaintiff:
The Hilb Group of Maryland, LLC
Defendant:
Tara Smith
Smith, Sr. v. McGinley et al
as 3:2023cv01952
Petitioner:
Mark Edward Smith, Sr.
Respondent:
Thomas McGinley, District Attorney of Monroe County and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. F&M Bank et al
as 1:2023cv01951
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
F&M Bank, Joy Heinbaugh, Todd A. Rock and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
