Cases 21 - 30 of 343
Stacy v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05718
Plaintiff:
Scott Ryan Stacy
Defendant:
Pierce County, NaphCare, Sieverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsel v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Eric Townsel
Defendant:
Kenneth Sawyer, David Kenney, Sandra Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. USA
as 2:2023cv00194
Petitioner:
Mason McCann Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mendoza v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv05077
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Velasquez Mendoza
Defendant:
John F Smith, Arturo Alejandro, Jo Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Littlefield v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tyler Littlefield
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Michelle Duncan, Jason Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starkgraf v. Pierce County Council et al
as 3:2023cv05390
Plaintiff:
Kristopher S Starkgraf
Defendant:
Pierce County Council, Ed Troyer, Bomkamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Pierce County Judicial System
as 3:2023cv05336
Plaintiff:
Titus Decarios Smith
Defendant:
Pierce County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hagos v. Smith et al
as 2:2023cv00528
Plaintiff:
Daniel Teklemariam Hagos
Defendant:
Cheyenne Smith and City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Andrewjeski
as 2:2023cv00501
Petitioner:
Jess Richard Smith
Respondent:
Melissa Andrewjeski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05142
Petitioner:
John Garrett Smith
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
