Cases 1 - 10 of 210
Nigel Parms v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 19-3873
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NIGEL DWAYNE PARMS
Sobina, Inc. v. Foremost Insurance Company et al
as 2:2019cv01214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Sobina, Inc., a Nevada Corporation and Sobina, Inc.
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company, Grand Rapids Michigan, Grand Rapids Michigan, Foremost Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Antonio Pearson v. Prison Health Service, et al
as 16-1140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONIO PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, SOMERSET HOSPITAL, MEDICAL DIRECTOR MCGRATH and others
DIXON v. KANE et al
as 2:2014cv01741
Petitioner:
TEREL DARNELL DIXON
Respondent:
MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, JOHN WETZEL, KATHLEEN KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Hankins v. Wolf, et al
as 14-3815
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT HANKINS
Defendant - Appellee:
WOLF, WHITE, Sergeant, RAYMOND SOBINA and others
WATSON v. SOBINA et al
as 2:2013cv07422
Petitioner:
DWIGHT WATSON
Respondent:
RAYMOND J. SOBINA, LYNN ABRAHAM and MIKE FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Hector Huerta
as 12-3849
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: HECTOR HUERTAS
Defendant - Respondent:
JEFFREY BEARD, RICHARD HALL, NANCY A. GIROUX and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
SEAN J MCLAUGHLIN, Honorable
Robert Hughes v. Raymond Sobina, et al
as 12-3324
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. HUGHES
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND SOBINA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
John Woods v. PA Department of Corrections, et al
as 12-3272
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WAYNE WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHERYL GILL, RAYMOND SOBINA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
