Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jackson v. Bowen et al
as 4:2023cv00897
Plaintiff:
Clifford D. Jackson, III
Defendant:
Warden Richard A. Bowen, Jr., ODRC Director Annette Chambers Smith, Jeff Mustard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Barfield v. Deputy Warden Special Services et al
as 3:2022cv00959
Plaintiff:
Zachary Barfield
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Special Services, Mailroom Supervisor, Chaplain Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dunikowski v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv02576
Defendant:
Recreation Administrator, Grafton Correctional, Unit Manager Administrator, Grafton Correctional, Deputy Warden Special Services, Grafton Correctional and others
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Dunikowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Coleman, et al
as 3:2017cv01051
Plaintiff:
Vincent R. Griffin
Defendant:
John Coleman, Warden Operation, Warden Special Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe v. Mohr et al
as 1:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jason Paul Wolfe
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Jason Bunting, Unknown Dep. Warden Special Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Mansfield State Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2014cv00715
Plaintiff:
Isaac Michael Harris
Defendant:
Mansfield State Correctional Institution, Unit Manager T. King, Vault Lt. Reece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Mansfield State Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2014cv00260
Plaintiff:
Isaac Michael Harris
Defendant:
Mansfield State Correctional Institution, Unit Manager T. King, Vault Lt. Reece and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Correction Institution Inspection Committee et al
as 5:2012cv00702
Plaintiff:
Robert Martin
Defendant:
Correction Institution Inspection Committee, CIIC Inspector Robinson, CIIC Director Saul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
