Cases 51 - 60 of 361
ADAMS v. KNIGHT
as 1:2018cv03855
Petitioner:
ERIC ADAMS
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LAUDERDALE-EL v. KNIGHT
as 2:2018cv00515
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE-EL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HUDSON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv03751
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JENNIFER FARMER, STANLEY KNIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
EDDIE R. HUDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. KINISON et al
as 1:2018cv03695
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. SMITH
Defendant:
HAMPTON, RAYMOND KINISON and STANLEY KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
YOUNG v. KNIGHT
as 1:2019cv00045
Respondent:
STANLEY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
JONATHAN YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ABNEY v. CORIZON MEDICAL COMPANY/WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv03977
Plaintiff:
KEITH D. ABNEY
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL COMPANY/WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, REBECCA J. TRIVETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DEARBORN v. WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv03837
Defendant:
IDOC, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, REBECCA J. TRIVETT and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DEARBORN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROWELL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv03494
Defendant:
STEVENSON, FULFORD, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
ERNEST J. ROWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2018cv02938
Plaintiff:
LOWELL B. SMITH
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, CORIZION MEDICAL COMPANY, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SHANNON v. BROWN et al
as 1:2018cv01780
Defendant:
J. BROWN, BETHANY CHIDLEY, CORIZON MEDICAL DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
MARK SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
