Cases 1 - 8 of 8
DAVIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv04841
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. PA. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GRATERFORD/PHOENIX S.C.I. et al
as 2:2019cv00192
Plaintiff:
LESTER WILSON
Defendant:
MR. KLINE, MR. COTTON, SUPERINTENDENT TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv06155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
WINN v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEMS et al
as 2:2016cv05275
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE WINN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEMS, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION GRATERFORD, CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINN v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2016cv00284
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE WINN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, JOHN E. WETZEL, CORRECTIONAL CARE SOLUTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2014cv03765
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MERCER, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE CAMP HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2014cv00674
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY E. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION MERCER, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE CAMP HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
QUARLES et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2013cv06345
Plaintiff:
VINCENT D. QUARLES
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, WENEROWICZ, STATE CORRECTION INSTITUTE GRATERFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
