Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BRAY v. RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER et al
as 1:2021cv02522
Defendant:
HAWK, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, RECEPTION DIAGNOSTIC CENTER and others
Plaintiff:
ADAM BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2020cv00644
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, Grage, Taylor and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLYFIELD v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2019cv03159
Plaintiff:
RANDY HOLYFIELD
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, AMY BARBAR, EMILY SNIDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABNEY v. WOODS et al
as 1:2018cv04060
Defendant:
VANIHEL, KINISON, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH ABNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENLEY v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2018cv00736
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS, WENDY KNIGHT, THE SACRED SPIRITUAL ADVISOR and others
Plaintiff:
TONY HENLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv02400
Defendant:
SERGEANTS (NAMES UNKNOWN), CORIZON, LLC, JANE DOE #1 and others
Plaintiff:
KEYTRON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00488
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MCGILL v. STATE OF INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2015cv00104
Defendant:
KATHY ALVEY, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, TAMMIE POPE and others
Plaintiff:
JARRETT EDWARD MCGILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
