Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Janice Altman, et al v. County of Santa Clara, et al
as 21-15602
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MOUNTAIN VIEW, SAM LICCARDO, MAX BOSEL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT LEE SWANN, CALIFORNIA GUN RIGHTS FOUNDATION, FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC. and others
Defendant:
GREGORY J. AHERN, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA and NICHOLAS MOSS
Altman et al v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 4:2020cv02180
Defendant:
Sheriff David Livingston, Sara Cody, Edgardo Garcia and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Lee Swann, Firearms Policy Coalition, Roman Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv03996
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mark DalPoggetto v. Wirecard AG et al
as 2:2019cv00986
Defendant:
Wirecard AG, Burkhard Ley, Jan Marsalek and others
Plaintiff:
Mark DalPoggetto
Thomas Chang, et al v. City of Daly City, et al
as 18-15799
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS CHANG, CHRISTINE GOIAS and MATTHEW CHANG, individually and as survivors of, and successors to, decendent ERROL CHANG
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF DALY CITY, MANUEL MARTINEZ, Daly City Police Chief, HAROLD ROLFES, Daly City Police Sergeant and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PACIFICA, JIM TASA, erroneously sued as PPD Chief of Police, JOE SPANHEIMER, Captain and others
Thomas Chang, et al v. City of Pacifica, et al
as 18-15798
Plaintiff - Appellee:
THOMAS CHANG, CHRISTINE GOIAS and MATTHEW CHANG, individually and as survivors of, and successors to, decendent ERROL CHANG
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PACIFICA, JIM TASA, erroneously sued as PPD Chief of Police, JOE SPANHEIMER, Captain and others
Defendant:
CITY OF DALY CITY, MANUEL MARTINEZ, Daly City Police Chief, HAROLD ROLFES, Daly City Police Sergeant and others
Chang et al v. City of Pacifica et al
as 4:2015cv04591
Plaintiff:
Thomas Chang , Christine Goias and Matthew Chang
Defendant:
City of Pacifica, City of Daly City, Jim Tasa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
