Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Steve Boggs, et al v. USDOJ, et al
as 20-16941
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRAD LEE NELSON, ALAN CHAMPAGNE, FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, named as Office of the Federal Public Defender for the District of Arizona, a Federal Defender organization and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Boggs et al v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2019cv05238
Plaintiff:
Mike Gallardo, Federal Public Defenders Office, Pete Rogovich and others
Defendant:
William P Barr and United States Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Steven Parker v. Johnson
as 5:2019cv00802
Respondent:
Johnson
Petitioner:
Steven Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Mark Parker v. Unknown Rowe
as 13-15870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK STEVEN PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN ROWE, Dr., FHA in his individual and official capacity
Budget Blinds Inc v. Mark Steven Parker et al
as 8:2012cv00989
Plaintiff:
Budget Blinds Inc
Defendant:
Does, Mark Steven Parker and Seemore45 LLC
Mark Parker v. Unknown Rowe
as 12-15306
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK STEVEN PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN ROWE, Dr., FHA in his individual and official capacity
Mark Parker v. Unknown Rowe
as 12-15305
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK STEVEN PARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN ROWE, Dr., FHA in his individual and official capacity
Robinson v. Red Rock Financial Services et al
as 2:2012cv00264
Plaintiff:
Douglas Robinson
Defendant:
Red Rock Financial Services, RMI Management LLC and Steven Parker
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
