Cases 11 - 20 of 59
JAY v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2015cv00002
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH JAY
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, KENNETH CAMERON, STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. WETZEL et al
as 5:2014cv06494
Petitioner:
ALBERT PEREZ
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REICHART v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2014cv00232
Plaintiff:
RICHARD REICHART
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL, STEVEN R. GLUNT, DAVID J. CLOSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OCASIO v. GLUNT
as 2:2014cv06101
Petitioner:
GABRIEL G. OCASIO
Respondent:
STEVEN R. GLUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GANTZ v. UNCLES et al
as 3:2014cv00218
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM GANTZ
Defendant:
I. UNCLES , D. PRICE , STEVEN R. GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REID v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05451
Petitioner:
ANTHONY REID
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and STEVEN R. GLUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
REID v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv05452
Petitioner:
ANTHONY REID
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, ROBERT GILMORE and STEVEN R. GLUNT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 dp Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (DEATH PENALTY)
Gantz v. Uncles et al
as 4:2014cv01687
Plaintiff:
Malcolm Gantz
Defendant:
I. Uncles, D. Price, Steven R. Glunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIAMOND v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2014cv04389
Petitioner:
ROBERT DIAMOND
Respondent:
JOHN E. WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BUCKS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. GLUNT et al
as 2:2014cv03980
Petitioner:
PATRICK BROWN
Respondent:
STEVEN R. GLUNT, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILLY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
