Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rutledge et al v. Wake Forest University School of Medicine et al
as 3:2024cv00404
Defendant:
William Richardson, Juilene Almond, Wake Forest University School of Medicine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Rutledge, A M R and A D R
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv01621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Stinson v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00879
Plaintiff:
Brenda Stinson
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Movement Mortgage LLC et al v. Intercontinental Capital Group, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Movement Mortgage LLC, Justin Wiesert, Isaac Alexander and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Capital Group, Inc.
El v. Bachinsky et al
as 3:2021cv00524
Plaintiff:
Akeem El Rel Walter Stinson and Akeem El
Defendant:
Colin Bachinsky, Eddie Brown and Rashida Farley
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Stinson v. USA
as 7:2021cv00041
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Richard Stinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stinson v. Taylor et al
as 1:2020cv00355
Defendant:
FNU Taylor and FNU Bright
Plaintiff:
George Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinson v. Berryhill
as 3:2019cv00155
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Brandon Stinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. STINSON et al
as 1:2010mc00051
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ROBERT STINSON, JR., LIFE'S GOOD, INC., LIFE'S GOOD STABL MORTGAGE FUND, LLC and others
Interested_party:
FIRST COMMONWEALTH SERVICE COMPANY, SUSAN L. STINSON, CHRISTINE A. STINSON and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert S. Stinson, Jr., et al
as 5:2010mc00045
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert S. Stinson, Jr., et al
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
