Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2022cv02697
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson and Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
John P. Yates, Blair, Lt. Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stinson v. Unknown BOP Medical Staff
as 2:2022cv02618
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown BOP Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
K. Cauley, Asst. Warden Hall, Camp Admin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Stinson v. Williams et al
as 2:2022cv02576
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Betty Williams and Nathan Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stinson v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02575
Petitioner:
Mark Stinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Stinson v. Williams
as 2:2022cv02538
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
Betty Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stinsons Industrial Maintenance, Inc. v. PMC Group N.A., Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02253
Plaintiff:
Stinsons Industrial Maintenance, Inc.
Defendant:
PMC Group N.A., Inc. and John Farve, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Stinson v. Dorsey
as 2:2021cv02759
Plaintiff:
Mark Stinson
Defendant:
J. Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gruber et al v. Tennessee Tech Board of Trustees et al
as 2:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Dr. Julia Gruber and Andrew Smith
Defendant:
Tennessee Tech Board of Trustees doing business as Tennessee Tech University, Dr. Lori Bruce, Dr. Claire Stinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinson v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv02526
Petitioner:
Mark Stinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
