Cases 31 - 40 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Stinson v. Farris et al
as 2:2017cv00057
Plaintiff:
Bradley Stinson
Defendant:
Brandon Farris, f/n/u Hilsky and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conexx Staffing Services, Inc., et al. v. Thacker
as 2:2017cv02350
Plaintiff:
Conexx Staffing Services, Inc. and Mark Stinson
Defendant:
Jeremy Thacker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinson v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (TV1)
as 3:2016cv00246
Plaintiff:
Sheila Stinson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
United Data Technologies, Inc. v. Byers et al
as 3:2016cv00139
Plaintiff:
United Data Technologies, Inc.
Defendant:
Scott Byers , Wrightcore, Inc. , Michael Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stinson v. Centurion of Tennessee, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00364
Plaintiff:
William R Stinson
Defendant:
Centurion of Tennessee, LLC and Eric Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stinson et al v. Adecco USA, Inc.
as 2:2015cv02338
Plaintiff:
Jayton Stinson and Conexx Staffing Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Adecco USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baxter Bailey & Associates v. Powers & Stinson, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv03012
Plaintiff:
Baxter Bailey & Associates
Defendant:
Powers & Stinson, Inc., Donald McKnatt and The Transportation Firm
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hughes v. Hamblen County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2014cv00335
Plaintiff:
Martin Ellison Hughes
Defendant:
Hamblen County Sheriff's Department, Correct Health Inc., Teresa Adkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acuff et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Bryan Acuff , Gabriel Archer , Michael Ashe and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
