Cases 1 - 10 of 21
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC v. Stout et al
as 2:2022cv02133
Plaintiff:
G & G Closed Circuit Events LLC
Defendant:
Kevin Stout individually and d/b/a Lookout Tavern and Lookout Tavern LLC an unknown business entity d/b/a Lookout Tavern
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605 Communications Act of 1934
Stoute-Shukri' v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05797
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Ahmal Dushawn Stoute-Shukri'
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stout v. Cornelius
as 2:2019cv04578
Defendant:
Unknown Cornelius
Plaintiff:
Ethelyn Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Horn et al
as 2:2018cv04902
Defendant:
Matthew William Horn, Thelda Williams, Ed Zuercher and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bon Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout v. Taylor et al
as 2:2018cv04112
Defendant:
Paul Penzone and Julian Taylor
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bon Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trejo v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv08098
Plaintiff:
Fernando Arnulfo Trejo, III
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Charles L Ryan, Unknown Chiu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ochoa et al v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2018cv00905
Plaintiff:
Leonorilda Ochoa , Rachel Garcia and Kerry Lynn Coniglio
Defendant:
Mesa, City of , Gilbert, Town of , Charles J Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stout v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv04046
Petitioner:
Thomas Bon Stout
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stout v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv03808
Plaintiff:
Caitlyn Stout
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Stout et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2017cv02707
Plaintiff:
Brian L Stout and Christie Stout
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
