Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Porter v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter and reginald-darnell
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Mathew C. Gladwell, Aaron M. Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
BERRY v. KLYAIC et al
as 2:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
SYMONE LAURICE BERRY
Defendant:
KLYAIC, NICHOLS and JULIE STOUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WARREN v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2023cv02047
Defendant:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF INDIANA, GREG HOLCUMB, INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
JOCELYN WARREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KIMBROUGH v. MOORE et al
as 1:2023cv01832
Plaintiff:
DAVID L. KIMBROUGH
Defendant:
TYLER MOORE, DOUGLAS STOUT, POLICE OFFICER NATHAN GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
CARTER-RADER v. CENTURION et al
as 2:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE JO CARTER-RADER
Defendant:
CENTURION, T. HOLLER, BETH MOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 2:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
SHANTA EBONY SHAREE HENDERSON
Defendant:
JAMIE LAUGHLIN and JULIE STOUT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. HARVEY et al
as 2:2023cv00210
Plaintiff:
DAIMIA R. ANDERSON
Defendant:
HARVEY, JULIE STOUT and ROBIN GRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNSER v. WEDDING et al
as 3:2023cv00055
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LEE UNSER
Defendant:
DAVID WEDDING, WOODS, BUTLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
