Cases 41 - 50 of 470
Hammett v. Virginia Department of Health Professions et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Stuart R. Hammett
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Health Professions and Virginia Board of Medicine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Barton Greene
as 22-4182
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BARTON STUART GREENE
US v. Barton Greene
as 22-4180
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
BARTON STUART GREENE
Novak v. Stuart
as 1:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Novak
Defendant:
Trooper Allen T. Stuart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nishith Patel v. Anne Albright
as 22-1162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NISHITH PATEL
Defendant / Appellee:
ANNE KORBEL ALBRIGHT, HONORABLE MARY ELLEN BARBERA and STUART BERGER
Green v. Morris et al
as 7:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Michael Duchelle Green
Defendant:
Candice Lee Morris, Jason Watts, Warden Younce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain and Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu
Defendant:
Richard L. Anderson, Morton Blackwell, Patricia Bast Lyman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Stuart Dameri
as 21-4695
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STUART ALEXANDER DAMERI
Cooke v. CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation et al
as 1:2021cv01401
Defendant:
Ryan Denise Estes, Cathy Korell, CT Corporation/Jack Kent Cooke Foundation and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Kent Cooke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kareem Olatuwan, Sr. v. Dr. Ofagh
as 21-7704
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAREEM AKEEM OLATUWAN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
DR. OFAGH, Mediko, PC, STUART BROTH, Dentist, Mediko, PC, DIXIE DELUTIS, Health Service Administrator, Mediko, PC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
