Cases 1 - 10 of 1,441
Florer v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
as 24-2591
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FLORER
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, LITHIA FORD OF BOISE, RHETT SHEEDER and others
Stuart Robinson v. Clise Properties, Inc.
as 24-2604
Plaintiff:
BARBARA A. STUART ROBINSON
Defendant:
CLISE PROPERTIES, INC.
Spencer v. Pulido-Esparza, et al.
as 24-2444
Plaintiff:
EDWARD B. SPENCER
Defendant:
L. PULIDO-ESPARZA, Correctional Officer at SATF, C. SMITH, Correctional Lieutenant at SATF, STUART SHERMAN, Warden at SATF and others
Stuart v. City of Scottsdale, et al.
as 24-2386
Plaintiff:
MARK STUART, an Individual and Chairman doing business as Save Our Preserve Incorporated doing business as Save Our Preserve Political Action Committee of Scottsdale
Defendant:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a Municipal Corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, TOM CLEARY, JASON GLENN and others
Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc v. Ba Bar Farm LLC et al
as 5:2024mc00006
Plaintiff:
Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc
Defendant:
Ba Bar Farm LLC and Stuart Lee Bennett
Smith v. Superior Court of California County of Alameda et al
as 3:2024cv01981
Plaintiff:
Andrea Smith
Defendant:
Superior Court of California County of Alameda, People of the State of California, Judge Stuart Hing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Robinson v. State of Washington
as 24-1772
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Stuart Robinson v. Clise Properties Inc
as 2:2024cv00397
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
Clise Properties Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stuart Robinson v. City of Seattle
as 2:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stuart Robinson
Defendant:
City of Seattle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Robinson v. Human Services Campus Incorporated
as 24-1551
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant:
HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
