Cases 1 - 10 of 104
CHAMBERS v. MONROE COUNTY CT. et al
as 1:2023cv02281
Petitioner:
MICHAEL S. CHAMBERS
Respondent:
MONROE COUNTY CT., JUDGE (TERESA HARPER), ATT. (STUART BAGGERLY) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
STUART v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv00253
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS M. STUART
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02434
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLeon v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2021cv00224
Plaintiff:
Mark DeLeon
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railroad Company and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Not Classified By Court:
Stuart A Nudleman
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Shicks v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2021cv00224
Defendant:
Mitchell Gerber, DHS, Cathy T Serrano and others
Plaintiff:
Stuart Jon Shicks
Not Classified By Court:
C Erik Chickedantz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WALTON v. CLAYBRIDGE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC. et al
as 1:2021cv01313
Defendant:
STUART R. BUTTRICK, RAMIN D. KAZEMI, TREE SERVICE UNKNOWN and others
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH WALTON
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL. HILL v. ANDREWS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03176
Defendant:
SCOTT ANDREWS, STUART HUFFER, HUFFER CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA EX REL. HILL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02312
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
IMO 2020 Attorney Mass Suspension
as 3:2020mc00017
In Re:
Mark Arnold Werling, John Christopher Havill, Steven Stoy Crone and others
WALKER v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv00402
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
STUART WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
