Cases 1 - 10 of 11
MURPHY et al v. TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv00971
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN MURPHY, AKEYA SIMPKINS, ALAN YOUNG and others
Defendant:
TITLEMAX OF VIRGINIA, INC., TITLEMAX OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC., TITLEMAX OF GEORGIA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Sadler v. USA
as 3:2019cv00655
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Byron Bernard Sadler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reynolds Innovations Inc. v. Smoke Anywhere For Penny's LLC et al
as 3:2015cv00273
Plaintiff:
Reynolds Innovations Inc.
Defendant:
Smoke Anywhere For Penny's LLC, Penny Sadler and Tommy Sadler
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
SLICE-SADLER V. PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00216
Plaintiff:
JESSICA SLICE-SADLER
Defendant:
PRINCIPAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
MCHAM v. CAPTIAL BANK et al
as 1:2014cv00999
Plaintiff:
KENNETH O. MCHAM and PATRICIA D. SMITH
Defendant:
CAPTIAL BANK, JIM TAYLOR, SHANE SIMMONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00553
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Sadler v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008mc00021
Petitioner:
Walter Lee Sadler
Respondent:
United States of America, United States Attorney Western District of North Carolina, Gretchen C.F. Shappert and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
