Cases 1 - 10 of 291
Lokesh Vuyyuru v. Y.S. Reddy, et al
as 24-7066
Plaintiff:
Lokesh B. Vuyyuru, M.D.
Defendant:
Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy, Gowtham Adani, Klaus Schwab and others
Lopez-Ordonez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1263
Petitioner:
LUIS ALBERTO LOPEZ-ORDONEZ, JULIA ALICIA SAY-ESTRADA, DASHA GISSEL LOPEZ-SAY and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jasthi et al v. USCIS et al
as 3:2024cv00095
Plaintiff:
Sai Sri Jasthi and Sri Harsha Moturu
Defendant:
USCIS, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Mary Beth Brennan Seng and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00535
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
SAYED v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv01815
Petitioner:
GHOTAI SAYED
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Shah v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2023cv02563
Plaintiff:
Sayed Mohammed Shah
Defendant:
Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas and Antonio Donis
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Choice Hotels International , Inc. et al v. Jai Sai Baba, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv03360
Petitioner:
Choice Hotels International, Inc. and Choice Hotels Owners Council
Respondent:
Jai Sai Baba LLC, Dipesh Patel and MDPD13 Investments, LLC
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0207
Zhuang v. Lucky Nail Spa, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv05118
Plaintiff:
Sai E Zhuang
Defendant:
Lucky Nail Spa, Inc., Jian Jian Han and Ronggai Yang
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Zhuang v. Lucky Nail Spa, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05118
Plaintiff:
SAI E ZHUANG
Defendant:
LUCKY NAIL SPA, INC., JIAN JIAN HAN and RONGGAI YANG
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
US v. Sai Vang
as 23-6522
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
SAI VANG
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
