Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kelly v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
as 1:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Stephen P. Kelly
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00039
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rupp v. Trzil et al
as 2:2018cv01033
Defendant:
Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company, School Sisters of Saint Francis, Inc, Rose Ann Trzil and others
Plaintiff:
Noah J Rupp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Emrit v. Saint Rose de Lima Hospital
as 4:2017cv00335
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Saint Rose de Lima Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. St. Anthony Regional Hospital and Nursing Home
as 3:2013cv03044
Plaintiff:
Samuel R Sims
Defendant:
Saint Anthony Regional Hospital and Nursing Home
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saint Jude Healthcare, LLC et al v. Corbin et al
as 4:2011cv00615
Plaintiff:
Saint Jude Healthcare, LLC and Thomas J. Moreland
Defendant:
James Gary Corbin, Hawkeye Hospice, LLC, 3CT, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saint Luke's Methodist Hospital v. Boulder Associates
as 1:2008cv00025
Defendant:
Boulder Associates and Boulder Associates
Plaintiff:
Saint Luke's Methodist Hospital and Saint Luke's Methodist Hospital
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Andre v. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints et al
as 4:2006cv00574
Plaintiff:
Lee Harlow Andre
Defendant:
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Robert C Oaks, Robert W Nye and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
