Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cerence Operating Company v. Samsung Electronics Company, LTD., et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Cerence Operating Company
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Company, LTD., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Kutt v. Apple Inc et al
as 2:2019cv00316
Defendant:
Google Corporation, Storage Post Inc, Seasons Condominiums and others
Plaintiff:
Mers Kutt
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Iron Oak Technologies LLC v. Samsung Electronics America Inc et al
as 3:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
Iron Oak Technologies LLC
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America Inc and Samsung Electronics Company Ltd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
Azure Networks LLC v. Samsung TeleCommunications America, LLC et al
as 6:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Azure Networks LLC
Defendant:
Samsung TeleCommunications America, LLC , Samsung Electronics America Inc , Samsung Electronics Company, LTD., and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 12-60704
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel Jim Hood, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INCORPORATED, CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
State of Mississippi v. AU Optronics Corporation, et al
as 12-90051
Plaintiff - Respondent:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel Jim Hood, Attorney General
Defendant - Petitioner:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, INCORPORATED, CHI MEI CORPORATION and others
Agere Systems Inc v. Samsung Elec Co Ltd
as 07-40984
Plaintiff - Appellee:
AGERE SYSTEMS INC, a Delaware Corporation
Defendant - Appellant:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY LTD, a Corporation of the Republic of Korea
Long v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 3:2007cv00028
Plaintiff:
Tammy Long and Tammy Long
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
