Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01840
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-4782
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mejia Ortiz et al v. United Contractor Services LLC et al
as 3:2026cv00651
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Mejia Ortiz, Meily Azucena Munoz Diaz, Yeison David Lopez Barrios and others
Defendant:
United Contractor Services LLC and ILC Builders Construction LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Cruz-Suazo v. Blanche
as 26-60354
Petitioner:
Edis Aman Cruz-Suazo, Eddy Samuel Cruz-Mejia and Jonathan Josue Cruz-Mejia
Respondent:
Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv22557
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv22555
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv02700
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States of America v. Filyaw (Morales-Arambula)
as 25-1586
Defendant:
NEFTALI FERNANDEZ, LEON GREENE, LORENZO MORALES-ARAMBULA and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Filyaw (Morales-Arambula)
as 25-527
Defendant:
LORENZO MORALES-ARAMBULA, NEFTALI FERNANDEZ, LEON GREENE and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
