Cases 101 - 110 of 19,804
USA v. Sanchez
as 24-50276
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Francisco Gonzalez Sanchez
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
SANCHEZ v. GR CONSTRUCTION LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21338
Plaintiff:
RUBEN SANCHEZ
Defendant:
GR CONSTRUCTION LLC and GILBERTO RIVERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rodriguez-Sanchez v. Aegean Express Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02701
Plaintiff:
Maximiliano Rodriguez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Aegean Express Inc. and Dhaniram Ramnarine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Calderon Sanchez v. Garland
as 24-2206
Petitioner:
MIGUEL CALDERON SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Camarena Sanchez v. Garland
as 24-2195
Petitioner:
JUAN MANUEL CAMARENA SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
HERNANDEZ et al v. SUPER SHINE, L.L.C. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv04703
Plaintiff:
GEORGINA HERNANDEZ, ADRIAN CORTES, JOSE LUIS SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
SUPER SHINE, L.L.C. LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, LARRY ENGEL, ERIC ENGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Castillo et al v. Deveze et al
as 4:2024cv01295
Plaintiff:
Jorge Castillo, Mario Portillo, Rene Reyes and others
Defendant:
Oscar Deveze and Worldwide Remodeling Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lusk v. Santa Rita Jail et al
as 4:2024cv02103
Plaintiff:
William Lusk, III
Defendant:
Santa Rita Jail, County of Alameda and Yesina Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
