Cases 41 - 50 of 2,968
Reeder v. Isachievici et al
as 7:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Mandy Reeder and Eric Reeder
Defendant:
Diana Isachievici, Jeffrey Dobbins, Sulema Chavez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00606
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Merrill v. Palacios-Gomez
as 8:2024cv00708
Defendant:
Eleazar Palacios-Gomez, Roberto Gomez, Roberto Palacios-Sanchez and others
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Merrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Nadeau et al v. Travis County et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Philip Nadeau and Roland Nadeau
Defendant:
Travis County, Canales, Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez-Mayen v. City of St. Petersburg et al
as 8:2024cv00690
Plaintiff:
Mr. Heriberto A Sanchez-Mayen
Defendant:
City of St. Petersburg, Michael Thacker and Sarah Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANCHEZ v. STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY et al
as 8:2024cv00560
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SANCHEZ
Defendant:
STANDARD PLUMBING SUPPLY, RICHARD REESE and REESE REAL ESTATE & INVESTMENT COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00362
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
