Cases 71 - 80 of 395
Sanchez v. Hoover et al
as 1:2020cv01036
Defendant:
Lt. Powell, Reynolds, Simona Flores and others
Petitioner:
Ajarhi Roberts
Plaintiff:
Emil Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANNARINO v. SANCHEZ
as 2:2020cv02642
Defendant:
STEVI MICHELLE SANCHEZ
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH MANNARINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
SANCHEZ v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2020cv00739
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO SANCHEZ
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD PROBATION AND PAROLE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SANCHEZ v. SUPT. SCI-PHOENIX et al
as 2:2020cv02278
Respondent:
SUPT. SCI-PHOENIX, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA
Petitioner:
CARLOS SANCHEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. P&S Transportation, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02045
Defendant:
MARK SANCHEZ, P&S Transportation, LLC and JOHN DOES 1-3
Plaintiff:
BERNARD JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JENNIFER B. et al v. TRAFFORD BOROUGH et al
as 2:2020cv00542
Defendant:
ADAM HLAD, CORY HOLMES, CARMEN DISSO and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY SANCHEZ and JENNIFER B.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00604
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramos-Sanchez v. USA
as 1:2020cv00578
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Enrique Ramos-Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HINTON et al v. ROSEWOOD INN CATERERS, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv01515
Plaintiff:
URSULA SANCHEZ, BROOKE JOHNSON, KATARINA VAN DERHAM and others
Defendant:
SANSOM STREET, INC., ROSEWOOD INN CATERERS, LLC and THOMAS SHERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
