Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Sanders v. Giles, et al. (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00329
Plaintiff:
Corey R. Sanders
Defendant:
Sandra Giles, Gwendolyn D. Davis and Susie Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Calloway v. Mason et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2013cv00311
Plaintiff:
Tyricka Lavon Calloway
Defendant:
Rene Mason, Jeremiah Thomas, Col. Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radford v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00188
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larry v. Giles et al
as 3:2012cv04201
Petitioner:
James Keith Larry
Respondent:
Sandra Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tigner v. Sparks et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00954
Plaintiff:
Arthur James Tigner
Defendant:
Ms. Sparks, Danny Gould, Officer Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shapley v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00618
Plaintiff:
Shaun Glovis Shapley
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Giles et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2012cv00567
Plaintiff:
Timothy Price
Defendant:
Sandra Giles and C. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00236
Plaintiff:
Rashad C. Lee
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones, Sandra Giles and Sylvester Nettles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Giles et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Harden Murphy
Defendant:
Sandra Giles , Renae Mason , Jessie Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trantham v. Thomas et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Harvey Joe Trantham
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Sandra Giles, Rene Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
