Cases 1 - 10 of 58
SATTERFIELD v. THOMAS et al
as 2:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
RASSOUL PAUL SATTERFIELD
Defendant:
DETECTIVE WILLIAM THOMAS, DETECTIVE FLOYD GALLO, ASSISTANT DISTRICT SANDY BYRD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. DALISMA et al.
as 3:2023cv00222
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY ROBINSON
Defendant:
DR. DALISMA, ROXY PLAYSO, NURSE ANTHONY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
BUONCRISTIANO v. CARNEY et al
as 2:2023cv02588
Plaintiff:
NICOLETTE BUONCRISTIANO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, BRUCE HERDMAN, RN SANDY VARGHESE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
JACKSON v. BRICKMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM P. JACKSON
Defendant:
A. BRICKMAN, SARAH K., HOLLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
James Trainor v. Wellpath, et al
as 23-1771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. TRAINOR
Defendant / Appellee:
WELLPATH, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, CRNP SUTHERLAND and others
Sandy v. U.S. Probation and Pretrial Services
as 2:2023cv00682
Petitioner:
KESTER SANDY
Respondent:
U.S. Probation and Pretrial Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
GOMEZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 1:2021cv16638
Plaintiff:
SANDY GOMEZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SZILAGYI v. MCCLURE et al
as 5:2020cv05691
Plaintiff:
SCOTT SZILAGYI
Defendant:
SANDY FOSTER MCCLURE, NICHOLAS SZMODIS and ROBERT SHUPP III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCLAUGHLIN v. MRS. DAVIS et al
as 3:2020cv15532
Defendant:
MRS. DAVIS, MS. VASQUEZ and MS. SANDY
Plaintiff:
CSHETARA MCLAUGHLIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAINOR v. WELLPATH et al
as 1:2020cv00225
Defendant:
CRNP BRENDA HARTZELL, C. HAYS, LISA LAMOREAUX and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES TRAINOR and JAMES M. TRAINOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
