Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Andersen v. Vagaro Inc
as 1:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Sandi Andersen doing business as Dharma Nutritional LLC doing business as Dharma Healing Center
Defendant:
Vagaro Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Varela v. Sandy Lane Auto, LLC
as 1:2021cv00212
Defendant:
Sandy Lane Auto, LLC doing business as Sandy Lane Auto Sales & Repair
Plaintiff:
Claudina Varela
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Ansay et al v. Hope Fisheries, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00478
Plaintiff:
Sandy Gallo and John Ansay, Sr.
Defendant:
Hope Fisheries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Avelin v. Grage Roy
as 1:2020cv00457
Plaintiff:
Archer Avelin and Nathan B. Grage
Defendant:
Sandie Patricia Leach Grage Roy and Kyung Ai Yu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
O'Neill v. Laquale et al
as 1:2020cv00251
Defendant:
City of Cranston, Sandy Stikel, John Rocchio and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Thomas O'Neill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. The Narragansett Electric Company d/b/a National Grid et al
as 1:2019cv00643
Plaintiff:
Nick Harvey, Bekki Schenker, Stuart Hebb and others
Defendant:
National Grid LNG, LLC, National Grid USA, The Narragansett Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kaan et al v. Sandy Lane Auto, LLC
as 1:2018cv00351
Plaintiff:
Sara Kaan and David Kaan
Defendant:
Sandy Lane Auto, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Berto et al v. Sovereign Bank, FSB et al
as 1:2013cv00312
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. Berto and Sandy Batista Berto
Defendant:
Sovereign Bank, FSB and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
BAEZ v. CONNELLY et al
as 1:2010cv00399
Plaintiff:
Sandy Baez
Defendant:
CONNELLY, MICHEAL NAYLOR , ANTHONY CARDELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baez v. USA
as 1:2009cv00485
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sandy Baez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
