Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Hoffman v. State of California et al
as 5:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Kristin Hoffman
Defendant:
State of California, San Benito County, California and Santa Clara County, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fikrou v. Montgomery County Office of Child Support Enforcement Division et al
as 2:2015cv01297
Plaintiff:
Guetatchew Fikrou
Defendant:
E. Harkleroad, Debbie Hinds, Christopher J. Kunz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Fitzsimmons v. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2015cv00027
Plaintiff:
Erin Maureen Fitzsimmons
Defendant:
United States Department of Health and Human Services, United States Department of Justice, State of California Judicial Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Johnson v. Valley Medical Moorpark Lab Clinic et al
as 5:2014cv00672
Plaintiff:
Nancy Johnson
Defendant:
Santa Clara County, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
Karl Wichelman, et al v. Santa Clara County, et al
as 12-16485
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KARL WICHELMAN and ANNE SABETTA
Defendant - Appellee:
SANTA CLARA COUNTY, California, SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, AKA VMC, WILLIAM JENSEN, Administrative Law Judge, Dr. and others
Wichelman et al v. Santa Clara County California et al
as 2:2010cv02125
Plaintiff:
Karl Wichelman and Anne Sabetta
Defendant:
Santa Clara County California, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, William Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dean Schwartzmiller v. L. Smith, et al
as 08-15952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEAN A. SCHWARTZMILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
L. SMITH, D. GONZALEZ, R. DILLON and others
Lyons v. Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2007cv03510
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Lyons
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, United States Department of Treasury and Santa Clara County, California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
