Cases 81 - 90 of 277
Cebertowicz v. Mutayoba et al
as 3:2018cv01866
Defendant:
Sarah Johnson, April Rankin-Wampler, James Mutayoba and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Cebertowicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kellmann v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv03242
Defendant:
Cameron M Watson, Michael M. Garrett, John Doe 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven F. Kellmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norfleet v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv01524
Defendant:
Frank Lawrence, Larue Love, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Marc Norfleet
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00589
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Martin v. Skeens et al
as 1:2018cv01292
Defendant:
S. Simpson, Jacqueline Lashbrook, Sandra Boechman and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MGM Resorts International et al v. Acosta et al
as 2:2018cv01288
Defendant:
Whtiney Day, Treza Mekhail, Chad Packard and others
Plaintiff:
Mandalay Bay, LLC f/k/a Mandalay Corp., MGM Resorts International, Mandalay Resort Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Sprehe v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv50226
Defendant:
A. Toth, Vincent Marrandino, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Sprehe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennings, Jr. v. Austin et al
as 3:2018cv01302
Plaintiff:
James C. Jennings, Jr.
Defendant:
Mrs. Austin, Mrs. Dean, Mrs. Wooderd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sarah Johnson v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2018cv04568
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Future Ford of Sacramento and Does 1 through 10, inclulsive
Plaintiff:
Sarah Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Sarah Johnson v. Ford Motor Company et al
as CAC/2:18-CV-04568
Plaintiff:
Sarah Johnson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Future Ford of Sacramento and Does 1 through 10, inclulsive
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
