Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NELSON et al v. CLAUSSEN et al
as 2:2023cv01896
Plaintiff:
MITCHELL NELSON, SARAH NELSON and PAULINA GIRALDO-JAMES
Defendant:
DON CLAUSSEN, DEREK DEBREE, MARISHA SIROIS and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nelson v. Stevens Transport, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02629
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nelson
Defendant:
Stevens Transport, Inc., Paragon Leasing, LP and Perry Patterson
Not Classified By Court:
Gail Mooney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Nelson v. Stevens Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02629
Not Classified By Court:
Gail Mooney
Plaintiff:
Sarah Nelson
Defendant:
Stevens Transport, Inc., Paragon Leasing, LP and Perry Patterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
E. Wade v. Woody Gilliland, et al
as 21-17007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E. K. WADE
Defendant / Appellee:
WOODY GILLILAND, WILLIAM SMITHERMAN, GEORGIA MARTIN and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02658
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
E. Wade v. Woody Gilliland, et al
as 19-15868
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM SMITHERMAN, GEORGIA MARTIN, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
E. K. WADE
Frederick Silver v. Candice Towner, et al
as 18-50158
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK O. SILVER
Defendant - Appellee:
CANDICE KATIE TOWNER, SARAH NELSON, TRINA GOMEZ and others
Wade v. Chao et al
as 3:2017mc80171
Plaintiff:
E.K. Wade
Defendant:
Elaine Chao, Woody Gilliland, Doug Betten and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
