Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02666
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2026cv01044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01532
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jones (PS) v. Sauce
as 1:2026cv00985
Plaintiff:
Ray Jones
Defendant:
Sauce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Lola's Fine Sauces, Inc. v. EcoIdeas Innovation, Inc.
as 4:2026cv00021
Plaintiff:
Lola's Fine Sauces, Inc.
Defendant:
EcoIdeas Innovation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Sauce Carchi v. Blanche
as 25-3182
Petitioner:
JOSE NEPTALI SAUCE CARCHI and CONCHA LASTENIA PANORA GUAMAN
Respondent:
PAMELA BONDI, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mitchell v. Sauce Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00421
Plaintiff:
Cody Mitchell
Defendant:
Sauce Holdings LLC and Luke Oil Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Colvin v. Sauce Holdings LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00419
Plaintiff:
Jared Colvin
Defendant:
Sauce Holdings LLC and Luke Oil Co., Inc.
Pretrial Service:
Robert Dignam
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
