Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Aguado v. XL Insurance America et al
as 2:2023cv02528
Plaintiff:
Sergio Mireles Aguado
Defendant:
XL Insurance America, Intercare Holdings Incorporated, Maria E Flores and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Saul Rodriquez Carlos v. Christian Pfeiffer
as 2:2023cv00360
Petitioner:
Carlos Saul Rodriquez and Saul Rodriguez Carlos
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hector Barba Sr. et al v. City of Huntington Park et al
as 2:2022cv08987
Plaintiff:
HECTOR BARBA, SR, NORMA BARBA and Hector Barba, Sr.
Defendant:
City of Huntington Park, MIGUEL SANCHEZ, JESUS VERIELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saul Rodriguez-Esquer v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-72486
Petitioner:
SAUL RODRIGUEZ-ESQUER, AKA Luis Alvarez-Cruz, AKA Saul Rodriguez, AKA Saul Rodriguezesquer
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Saul Rodriguez Solis, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-70051
Petitioner:
SAUL RODRIGUEZ SOLIS, MARIA HILDA RODRIGUEZ and JESSICA JAZMIN RODRIGUEZ PICASSO
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Saul Carlos v. Leland McEwen
as 12-56684
Petitioner - Appellant:
SAUL RODRIGUEZ CARLOS
Respondent - Appellee:
LELAND MCEWEN
Saul Rodriguez Carlos v. Leland McEwen
as 2:2011cv05433
Petitioner:
Saul Rodriguez Carlos
Respondent:
Leland McEwen
Jose Saul Rodriguez v. Ndex West LLC et al
as 8:2011cv00341
Defendant:
Americas Servicing Company, Ndex West LLC and US Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Jose Saul Rodriguez
Leiva v. Curry
as 3:2009cv00652
Petitioner:
Saul Rodriguez Leiva
Defendant:
Ben Curry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Saul Rodriguez Palos, et al v. Michael Mukasey
as 08-71497
Petitioner:
SAUL RODRIGUEZ PALOS and VIRGINIA BEDOLLA DE RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
