Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Saunders v. Funez
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Michael Saunders
Defendant:
Danny Jousee Funez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Saunders v. Multnomah County et al
as 3:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Garry Saunders, Estate of Bren Alan Coffman and Garry W. Saunders
Defendant:
Multnomah County, Brian Parks, Steve Alexander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aplin v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00258
Plaintiff:
Colby Aplin
Defendant:
B. Smith, Dewald, Fraser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frankenfield v. Tillerson et al
as 1:2017cv00679
Defendant:
Adam E. Fox, Brenda Saunders Sprague and Rex W. Tillerson
Plaintiff:
James Frankenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
United States of America v. The Estate of Angela J. Sanders et al
as 6:2017cv00546
Defendant:
Don Able, Gretchen Chapman, Edward Saunders and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Saunders v. Klamath Co. Jail et al
as 1:2016cv01088
Defendant:
Jail Staff, Klamath Co. Jail and Klamath County
Plaintiff:
Heath Allen Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danis et al v. Premera Blue Cross
as 3:2015cv01392
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Saunders, Paul Danis and Lars Linden
Defendant:
Premera Blue Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mallery McLean v. Pine Eagle School District, No. 61 et al
as 3:2015cv00654
Defendant:
Alpine Alarm Communications and Construction, Mark Butler, Michael Corley and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Mallery McLean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Saunders v. Nooth
as 2:2015cv00048
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
Petitioner:
Colin Saunders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00022
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
