Cases 1 - 10 of 19
SULLIVAN et al v. CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY et al
as 2:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
GREGORY B SULLIVAN
Defendant:
CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY, JUDGE DOMINIC PILEGGI, EEOC PHILADELPHIA OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
NIEVES v. SAV-A-LOT et al
as 2:2020cv01348
Defendant:
MORAN FOODS, LLC and SAV-A-LOT
Plaintiff:
BETTY NIEVES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN v. SAV-A-LOT
as 2:2018cv04632
Plaintiff:
SABRINA ALLEN
Defendant:
SAV-A-LOT and MORAN FOODS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKER v. ONEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2018cv01974
Plaintiff:
ANGELA BAKER
Defendant:
MORAN FOODS, LLC, MORAN FOODS, INC., ONEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hamilton Holdings Group, Inc. v. Sav-a-Lot Nutrition Centers, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv61656
Plaintiff:
Hamilton Holdings Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Sav-a-Lot Nutrition Centers, Inc. , Alfred Forman, Anita Arabia and others
Cause Of Action: Computer Fraud and Abuse Act
Matis v. Sav-A-Lot, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01022
Plaintiff:
Karen C. Matis
Defendant:
Sav-A-Lot, Inc. and Moran Foods, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Nikole Brown, et al v. Moran Foods Inc, et al
as 12-1205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NIKOLE BROWN and DAVID STRATTON, h/w
Defendant - Appellee:
MORAN FOODS INC, DBA Sav-A-Lot, SUPERVALU INC, DBA Sav-A-Lot, SAV-A-LOT and others
WILLIAMS v. SAV-A-LOT FOOD STORE
as 2:2011cv04463
Plaintiff:
GWENNETTE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
SAV-A-LOT FOOD STORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BROWN et al v. MORAN FOODS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02292
Plaintiff:
NIKOLE BROWN and DAVID STRATTON
Defendant:
MORAN FOODS, INC. , SUPERVALU, INC. , SAV-A-LOT, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
