Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Anderson et al v. D.R. Horton Incorporated - Dietz-Crane et al
as 2:2013cv00662
Defendant: D.R. Horton Incorporated - Dietz-Crane and Unknown Parties
Plaintiff: Donald Anderson , Pamela Anderson , Richard Andrew and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Harris v. Sawyer et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02112
Plaintiff: Matthew L Harris
Defendant: Unknown Sawyer, R T Jones, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapa v. Alvarez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00293
Plaintiff: Ralph John Chapa
Defendant: Jeffrey Alvarez, Matthew Barker, Richard D Friedman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Borroughs et al v. San Luis Valley Federal Bank et al
as 2:2010cv01576
Plaintiff: Richard S Borroughs , Galit Borroughs , G Greg Sawyers and others
Defendant: San Luis Valley Federal Bank, Wesco Properties LLC, Douglas West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01648
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pamir Airways v. Global Aircraft Solutions Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00137
Plaintiff: Pamir Airways
Defendant: Global Aircraft Solutions, Inc., Renegade Venture Corp., dba Hamilton Aerospace Technologies, Inc., John B Sawyer and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Robinson v. Rinaudo et al
as 2:2008cv01374
Plaintiff: Michael R Robinson
Defendant: Debra Rinaudo, Michael Salazzar, Kathleen Philips and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Civil Rights None
Prusha et al v. Bell et al
as 2:2007cv01182
Plaintiff: Virginia Prusha and John Prusha
Defendant: Richard Bell, Does, Roes Corps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?