Cases 1 - 10 of 55
SANDERS v. COULEHAN et al
as 2:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
GIOVANNI SANDERS
Defendant:
D. COULEHAN, E. HURD, CO. D. LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KELLER v. SCHAEFFER
as 2:2022cv02627
Plaintiff:
Millicent Keller
Defendant:
THOMAS A SCHAEFFER and THOMAS SCHAEFFER
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
FITZGERALD v. PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 2:2022cv00181
Petitioner:
DAVID WONTAE FITZGERALD
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA PAROLE BOARD, JENNIFER SCHAEFFER, NATHAN SIMON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CICCOTELLI v. INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv05296
Plaintiff:
ALEX CICCOTELLI
Defendant:
INDEPENDENCE REALTY TRUST, INC., SCOTT F. SCHAEFFER, WILLIAM C DUNKELBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Keller et al v. Wellspan Health
as 1:2021cv02025
Plaintiff:
Michael Keller and Kevin Schaeffer
Defendant:
Wellspan Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
SCHAEFFER v. SAUL
as 5:2021cv03081
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN DAVID SCHAEFFER
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Schaeffer v. USA
as 3:2021cv00220
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Laverne Schaeffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Borrelli v. Schaeffer et al
as 3:2020cv00205
Defendant:
J.T. Herber, III, John Redman, Nicole Redman and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Borrelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTATE OF RONALD SINGLETARY et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv00190
Plaintiff:
LATIESHA SINGLETARY, AMINAH SINGLETARY and ESTATE OF RONALD SINGLETARY
Defendant:
POLICE COMMISSIONER RICHARD ROSS, POLICE OFFICER MICHAEL NAVEDO, POLICE OFFICER ROBERT SCHUTTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRF, INC. v. Y-PRIME, INC. et al
as 2:2018cv04979
Defendant:
ERIN CECCOLI, MICHAEL PEROT, LOREN SCHAEFFER and others
Plaintiff:
CRF, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
