Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Harvey Clark v. Schlumberger Technology Corp, et al
as 20-50209
Defendant / Appellee:
SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED, PAAL KIBSGAARD, Chairman and CEO Schlumberger LTD and SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HARVEY LEE CLARK
Hsieh v. Apache Deepwater, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00408
Defendant:
Nustar Pipeline Company, LLC, Chevron Phillips Chemical Company, LP, Baker Hughes, a GE Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Hsieh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Myers v. Schlumberger Ltd et al
as 6:2019cv00239
Defendant:
Schlumberger Ltd, Schlumberger N V and Smith International Inc
Plaintiff:
Charles Walter Myers
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Story v. Schlumberger Ltd et al
as 6:2019cv00240
Defendant:
Schlumberger Ltd, Schlumberger N V and Smith International Inc
Plaintiff:
Joel Brent Story
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Drobish v. Schlumberger Ltd et al
as 6:2019cv00238
Defendant:
Schlumberger Ltd, Smith International Inc and Schlumberger N V
Plaintiff:
Karl Drobish
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2018cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv06853
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv02924
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
