Cases 71 - 80 of 950
SCHMIDT v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2022vv00772
Petitioner:
MARNI SCHMIDT
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
USA v. Schmidt
as 22-50592
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Lawrence Allen Schmidt
Dines v. Kelly et al
as 2:2022cv02248
Plaintiff:
Murray Dines doing business as Terpene Distribution
Defendant:
Laura Kelly and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Diah v. United States Small Business Administration
as 22-1346
Petitioner:
Aror-Ark Ark O'Diah, c/o Timespeed Worldwide Global Judical Watch Moral Health Service Systems, Inc.
Respondent:
United States Small Business Administration, AKA SBA, Isabella Casillas Guzman, SBA Administrator (in their Individual and Official Capacities), Beth Goldberg, SBA New York District Office Director (in their Individual and Official Capacities) and others
Madison et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00830
Plaintiff:
Madison, Jon Madison, Shannon Mahurin and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
California Crane School, Inc. v. USDC-CAOAK
as 22-70105
Not Classified By Court:
In re: CALIFORNIA CRANE SCHOOL, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarlysituated, GOOGLE LLC, ALPHABET, INC. and others
Petitioner:
CALIFORNIA CRANE SCHOOL, INC., on behalf of itself and all others similarlysituated
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, OAKLAND
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1483
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jordin Schmidt v. American Direct Funding LLC
as 8:2022cv00873
Plaintiff:
Jordin Schmidt
Defendant:
American Direct Funding LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Arcell et al v. Google LLC et al
as 5:2022cv02499
Plaintiff:
Mary Katherine Arcell, Keith Dean Bradt, Jose Brito and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Alphabet, Inc., XXVI Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Project Veritas, et al v. Michael Schmidt, et al
as 22-35271
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PROJECT VERITAS and PROJECT VERITAS ACTION FUND
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL SCHMIDT, in his official capacity as Multnomah County District Attorney and ELLEN ROSENBLUM, in her official capacity as Oregon Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
