Cases 1 - 10 of 65
Stinson v. Cauley et al
as 2:2022cv02611
Plaintiff:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant:
K. Cauley, Asst. Warden Hall, Camp Admin Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Aldridge et al v. Regions Bank
as 3:2021cv00082
Plaintiff:
Everett Mills, Rick Eldridge, Louis Frank Knight and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Martinez v. Schmidt
as 2:2019cv02894
Defendant:
Randall Schmidt
Plaintiff:
Saul Molina Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Michael, Inc. v. Spencer et al
as 3:2019cv01126
Defendant:
West Tennessee Pain Specialists, PLLC, Charles Spencer and Roy Schmidt, M.D.
Plaintiff:
David Michael, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Saidak v. Schmidt
as 3:2019cv00487
Defendant:
Michael Schmidt and Trumpet of the Lord
Plaintiff:
Derek Saidak
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Valenzuela v. Corizon Healthcare Inc. Headquarters et al
as 3:2019cv00758
Defendant:
Doctor Patricia Schmidt, Doctor f/n/u Fullhoe, Aleta A. Trauger and others
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valenzuela v. Corizon Health Headquarters et al
as 3:2018cv00432
Plaintiff:
Melinda Gabriella Valenzuela
Defendant:
Corizon Health Headquarters, Jane Doe, Steve Rector and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Champion v. CACI International, Inc. et al (JRG2)
as 2:2018cv00043
Plaintiff:
Randy Champion
Defendant:
CACI International, Inc., CACI Premier Technology, Inc., CACI, Inc. -Federal and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Chase v. White et al
as 3:2016cv01576
Plaintiff:
David Chase
Defendant:
Matthew K. White, Scott F. Hull, Jeffrey S. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chase v. White et al
as 3:2015cv00631
Plaintiff:
David Chase
Defendant:
Matthew K. White, Scott F. Hull, Jeffrey S. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
