Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Baker et al v. Lind et al
as 1:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
David Baker and Elijah Bright
Defendant:
Christopher Lind and David Schofield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00626
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Primm v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2019cv00690
Defendant:
Rebecca Hunter, Tennessee Department of Human Resources, Debbie Inglis and others
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Primm
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Simkins v. Grandview Hospital et al
as 3:2018cv00309
Defendant:
Curt Sulte, Indiana Neuroscience Associates, Michael Stafford and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Simkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyle Kirchner v. TN, et al
as 15-5721
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KYLE KIRCHNER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD and others
Defendant:
JONATHAN EDGEMON and ARRON SILVIERA
Morris v. Jordan et al
as 2:2015cv02428
Plaintiff:
Janie Morris
Defendant:
Nicky Jordan, Brenda Jones, Derrick Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Primm v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2015cv00230
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Primm
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Cole v. TN, et al
as 14-6380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT EARL COLE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF TENNESSEE, ADA Claim Only, CHARLES TRAUGHBER, YUSEF HAKEEM and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01122
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
