Cases 1 - 10 of 236
Galdos-Shapiro v. The Town of Great Barrington et al
as 3:2024cv30070
Plaintiff:
Arantzazu Zuzene Galdos-Shapiro
Defendant:
The Town of Great Barrington, The Berkshire Hills Regional School District, Paul E. Storti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv30049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv10747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
M.R. v. Spencer-East Brookfield Regional School District et al
as 4:2024cv40011
Plaintiff:
M R
Defendant:
Spencer-East Brookfield Regional School District, The Spencer-East Brookfield Regional School Committee and Richard Langelier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Hutnak, et al
as 23-2006
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
In Re: Parker
as 23-2005
Petitioner / Appellant:
DAVID PARKER, acting as guardian on behalf of R.P.
Respondent / Appellee:
KIMBERLY HUTNAK, NOELLE K. CLAPHAM, as a representative of the court, and as an individual, PHYLLIS HUTNAK, as an individual and others
Parker v. Hutnak, et al.
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
David Parker
Defendant:
Noelle Clapham, Kimberly Hutnak, Phyllis Hutnak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
